Kimi K3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI, while Ling 3.0 Flash comes from InclusionAI. Kimi K3 was released in July 2026, and Ling 3.0 Flash followed a month later in August 2026. Kimi K3 is the larger model at roughly 2.8 trillion parameters, against 124 billion for Ling 3.0 Flash.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Kimi K3 leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Kimi K3 scores 88.3% against 57.0%; BrowseComp, where Kimi K3 scores 91.2% against 72.2%. Averaged across everything we track, Kimi K3 sits at 67.8% and Ling 3.0 Flash at 68.5%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 50 times cheaper than Kimi K3 at $3 and $15. Kimi K3 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Kimi K3 accepts text and images as input, while Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text. On tooling, only Kimi K3 supports function calling and only Kimi K3 offers structured output.

CharacteristicKimi K3Ling 3.0 Flash
CompanyMoonshot AIInclusionAI
Release DateJuly 16, 2026August 4, 2026
Parameters2.8T124B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M131K
Context (output)1.0M131K
Input Price / 1M$3.00$0.06
Output Price / 1M$15.00$0.18
Average Score67.8%68.5%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.188.3%57.0%
BrowseComp91.2%72.2%
MCP Atlas84.2%65.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Kimi K3
Ling 3.0 Flash
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.6
0.9
0.6
BrowseComp0.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7
MCP Atlas0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7

Verdict

Ling 3.0 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Kimi K3 — 0.7, Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 75.0x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $3.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Kimi K3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Ling 3.0 Flash is newer: released 8/4/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Kimi K3 or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Kimi K3 or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $3.00.
Which has a larger context window — Kimi K3 or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Kimi K3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

The Kimi K3 and Ling 3.0 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Kimi K3 or Ling 3.0 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.