Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes from Xiaomi. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash followed 2 months later in September 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the larger model at roughly 309 billion parameters, against 118 billion for Laguna S 2.1.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 67.9% against 40.4%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 87.6% against 70.2%. Averaged across everything we track, Laguna S 2.1 sits at 57.4% and MiMo-V2.6-Flash at 55.6%.

Laguna S 2.1 is the cheaper API at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, about 40% below MiMo-V2.6-Flash at $0.14 and $0.28. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Laguna S 2.1 accepts text as input, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio, and video. On tooling, only MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports function calling and only MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers structured output.

CharacteristicLaguna S 2.1MiMo-V2.6-Flash
CompanyPoolsideXiaomi
Release DateJuly 21, 2026September 22, 2026
Parameters118B309B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.14
Output Price / 1M$0.20$0.28
Average Score57.4%55.6%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.140.4%67.9%
Terminal-Bench 2.170.2%87.6%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
DeepSWE 1.10.4 vs 0.7
0.4
0.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.9
0.7
0.9

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6, MiMo-V2.6-Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.14/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.14.
Which has a larger context window — Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.