Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.1
CompanyPoolsideMeta
Release DateJuly 21, 2026July 9, 2026
Parameters118B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.10$1.25
Output Price / 1M$0.20$4.25
Average Score0.60.8
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.70.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1
Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

Laguna S 2.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6, Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 18.3x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 7/21/2026 and 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.