Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside, while Muse Spark 1.2 comes from Meta. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and Muse Spark 1.2 followed a month later in August 2026. Laguna S 2.1 has a published size of about 118 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.2.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.2 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where Muse Spark 1.2 scores 59.0% against 40.4%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Muse Spark 1.2 scores 83.0% against 70.2%. Averaged across everything we track, Laguna S 2.1 sits at 57.4% and Muse Spark 1.2 at 71.0%.

Laguna S 2.1 is the cheaper API at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 13 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 at $1.25 and $4.25. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Laguna S 2.1 accepts text as input, while Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text and images. On tooling, only Muse Spark 1.2 supports function calling and only Muse Spark 1.2 offers structured output.

CharacteristicLaguna S 2.1Muse Spark 1.2
CompanyPoolsideMeta
Release DateJuly 21, 2026August 5, 2026
Parameters118B—
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)—131K
Input Price / 1M$0.10$1.25
Output Price / 1M$0.20$4.25
Average Score57.4%71.0%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.140.4%59.0%
Terminal-Bench 2.170.2%83.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1
Muse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE 1.10.4 vs 0.6
0.4
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6, Muse Spark 1.2 — 0.7.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 18.3x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Muse Spark 1.2 is newer: released 8/5/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Laguna S 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Laguna S 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.