Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1 is developed by Poolside, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comes from NVIDIA. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) followed a month later in August 2026. Laguna S 2.1 is the larger model at roughly 118 billion parameters, against 30 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B).

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Laguna S 2.1 leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Laguna S 2.1 scores 70.2% against 24.6%; SWE-bench Multilingual, where Laguna S 2.1 scores 78.5% against 39.3%. Averaged across everything we track, Laguna S 2.1 sits at 57.4% and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) at 45.3%.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheaper API at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 2 times cheaper than Laguna S 2.1 at $0.10 and $0.20. Laguna S 2.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B). On tooling, only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) supports function calling and only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) offers structured output.

CharacteristicLaguna S 2.1Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyPoolsideNVIDIA
Release DateJuly 21, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters118B30B
MultimodalNoNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)262K
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.05
Output Price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Average Score57.4%45.3%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.170.2%24.6%
SWE-bench Multilingual78.5%39.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Laguna S 2.1
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.2
0.7
0.2
SWE-bench Multilingual0.8 vs 0.4
0.8
0.4

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.5.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 1.2x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.10/1M tokens.

Context Window

Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.10.
Which has a larger context window — Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Laguna S 2.1 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.

The Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.