LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

LFM2.5-2.6B is developed by Liquid AI, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes from Xiaomi. LFM2.5-2.6B was released in August 2026, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash followed a month later in September 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the larger model at roughly 309 billion parameters, against 3 billion for LFM2.5-2.6B.

We have 8 benchmark results for LFM2.5-2.6B and 16 benchmark results for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available through an API at $0.14 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for LFM2.5-2.6B, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicLFM2.5-2.6BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
CompanyLiquid AIXiaomi
Release DateAugust 4, 2026September 22, 2026
Parameters3B309B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)—1.0M
Input Price / 1M—$0.14
Output Price / 1M—$0.28
Average Score55.5%55.6%

Verdict

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: LFM2.5-2.6B — 0.6, MiMo-V2.6-Flash — 0.6.

Recency

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 8/4/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — LFM2.5-2.6B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — LFM2.5-2.6B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — LFM2.5-2.6B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The LFM2.5-2.6B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the LFM2.5-2.6B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.