LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Ling 3.1 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI, while Ling 3.1 Flash comes from InclusionAI. LFM2.5-VL-3B was released in August 2026, and Ling 3.1 Flash followed a month later in September 2026. Ling 3.1 Flash is the larger model at roughly 560 billion parameters, against 3 billion for LFM2.5-VL-3B.
We have 23 benchmark results for LFM2.5-VL-3B and 11 benchmark results for Ling 3.1 Flash, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.
| Characteristic | LFM2.5-VL-3B | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Liquid AI | InclusionAI |
| Release Date | August 12, 2026 | September 30, 2026 |
| Parameters | 3B | 560B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Average Score | 63.7% | 65.0% |
Verdict
Ling 3.1 Flash leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Both models show comparable average scores: LFM2.5-VL-3B — 0.6, Ling 3.1 Flash — 0.6.
Ling 3.1 Flash is newer: released 9/30/2026 vs 8/12/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — LFM2.5-VL-3B or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Which model is cheaper — LFM2.5-VL-3B or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Which has a larger context window — LFM2.5-VL-3B or Ling 3.1 Flash?
The LFM2.5-VL-3B and Ling 3.1 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the LFM2.5-VL-3B or Ling 3.1 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.