Ling 3.0 Flash vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comes from Microsoft. Both were released in August 2026. The two are similar in size, at about 124 billion and 138 billion parameters respectively.

We have 19 benchmark results for Ling 3.0 Flash and 2 benchmark results for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash, but they overlap on a single test: Terminal-Bench 2.1, where MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores 62.9% against 57.0%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 3 times cheaper than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at $0.20 and $1.20. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash takes the larger context window at 256K tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash accepts text and images.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashMAI-Code-1.1-Flash
CompanyInclusionAIMicrosoft
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters124B138B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K256K
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$0.06$0.20
Output Price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Average Score68.5%67.8%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.157.0%62.9%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Terminal-Bench 2.10.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 5.8x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $0.20/1M tokens.

Context Window

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports a larger context: 256K vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/4/2026 and 8/11/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $0.20.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports a larger context: 256,000 tokens vs 131,072.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.