Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI, while Qwen3.8 Flash comes from Alibaba. Both were released in August 2026. The two are similar in size, at about 124 billion and 125 billion parameters respectively.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on LiveCodeBench v6, where Qwen3.8 Flash scores 91.9% against 82.8%; SWE-bench Multilingual, where Qwen3.8 Flash scores 81.0% against 72.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Ling 3.0 Flash sits at 68.5% and Qwen3.8 Flash at 68.5%.

Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens, roughly 3 times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash at $0.15 and $0.47. Qwen3.8 Flash takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 131K for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash accepts text as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicLing 3.0 FlashQwen3.8 Flash
CompanyInclusionAIAlibaba
Release DateAugust 4, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters124B125B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)131K1.0M
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.06$0.15
Output Price / 1M$0.18$0.47
Average Score68.5%68.5%
Benchmarks
LiveCodeBench v682.8%91.9%
SWE-bench Multilingual72.4%81.0%
IFBench74.5%81.3%
SWE-Bench Pro56.6%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash
LiveCodeBench v60.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
SWE-bench Multilingual0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
IFBench0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Ling 3.0 Flash — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Ling 3.0 Flash is 2.6x cheaper: input $0.06/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 131K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/4/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.06 per 1M tokens vs $0.15.
Which has a larger context window — Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 131,072.

The Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.