Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Qwen3 235B A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | Alibaba |
| Release Date | December 6, 2024 | April 28, 2025 |
| Parameters | 70B | 235B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | 128K | 128K |
| Context (output) | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.88 | $0.20 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.88 | $0.60 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| MMLU | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Qwen3 235B A22B
MMLU0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — 0.8, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3 235B A22B is 2.2x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.88/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 128K tokens.
Recency
Qwen3 235B A22B is newer: released 4/28/2025 vs 12/6/2024.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.88.
Which has a larger context window — Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports a larger context: 128,000 tokens vs 128,000.
The Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.