LongCat-Flash-Chat vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | LongCat-Flash-Chat | LongCat-Flash-Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meituan | Meituan |
| Release Date | August 28, 2025 | September 21, 2025 |
| Parameters | 560B | 560B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| ZebraLogic | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| MATH-500 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
LongCat-Flash-Chat
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
GPQA0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8
ZebraLogic0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
MATH-5001.0 vs 1.0
1.0
1.0
MMLU-Pro0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
Verdict
LongCat-Flash-Thinking leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: LongCat-Flash-Chat — 0.9, LongCat-Flash-Thinking — 0.9.
Recency
LongCat-Flash-Thinking is newer: released 9/21/2025 vs 8/28/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The LongCat-Flash-Chat and LongCat-Flash-Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the LongCat-Flash-Chat or LongCat-Flash-Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.