LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiniMax M2.5: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meituan | MiniMax |
| Release Date | January 13, 2026 | February 11, 2026 |
| Parameters | 560B | 230B |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| BrowseComp | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.6 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
MiniMax M2.5
BrowseComp0.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8
SWE-Bench Verified0.6 vs 0.8
0.6
0.8
Verdict
MiniMax M2.5 leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 — 0.8, MiniMax M2.5 — 0.7.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 — 0.6, MiniMax M2.5 — 0.8.
Recency
MiniMax M2.5 is newer: released 2/11/2026 vs 1/13/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M2.5 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiniMax M2.5 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.