MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comes from NVIDIA. MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released in September 2026, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) followed a month later in October 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the larger model at roughly 1.0 trillion parameters, against 120 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on OSWorld-Verified, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 82.0% against 51.1%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 89.9% against 66.7%. Averaged across everything we track, MiMo-V2.6-Pro sits at 59.7% and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) at 60.9%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is the cheaper API at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens, roughly 2 times cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.43 and $0.87. MiMo-V2.6-Pro takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B). MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts text, images, audio, and video as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicMiMo-V2.6-ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
CompanyXiaomiNVIDIA
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026October 15, 2026
Parameters1.0T120B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)—262K
Input Price / 1M$0.43$0.20
Output Price / 1M$0.87$1.00
Average Score59.7%60.9%
Benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified82.0%51.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.189.9%66.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
OSWorld-Verified0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.7
0.9
0.7

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: MiMo-V2.6-Pro — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) — 0.6.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1.1x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.43/1M tokens.

Context Window

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is newer: released 10/15/2026 vs 9/22/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.43.
Which has a larger context window — MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.