Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | Alibaba |
| Release Date | July 9, 2026 | September 22, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 4B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 262K |
| Context (output) | 131K | 262K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.10 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.25 | $0.60 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 7.9x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.
Context Window
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.
Recency
Muse Spark 1.1 is newer: released 7/9/2026 vs 9/22/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,144.
The Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.