Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta, while Qwen3.6-27B comes from Alibaba. Qwen3.6-27B was released in April 2026, and Muse Spark 1.1 followed 3 months later in July 2026. Qwen3.6-27B has a published size of about 28 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.1.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on Humanity's Last Exam, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 62.1% against 24.0%; CharXiv-R, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 88.0% against 78.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Muse Spark 1.1 sits at 70.7% and Qwen3.6-27B at 77.5%.

Qwen3.6-27B is the cheaper API at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens, roughly 2 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $1.25 and $4.25. Muse Spark 1.1 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B. Both accept text and images as input.

CharacteristicMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.6-27B
CompanyMetaAlibaba
Release DateJuly 9, 2026April 21, 2026
Parameters28B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.25$0.60
Output Price / 1M$4.25$3.60
Average Score70.7%77.5%
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam62.1%24.0%
CharXiv-R88.0%78.4%
SWE-Bench Pro61.5%53.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.6-27B
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.2
0.6
0.2
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.1 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.7, Qwen3.6-27B — 0.8.

API Cost

Qwen3.6-27B is 1.3x cheaper: input $0.60/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Muse Spark 1.1 is newer: released 7/9/2026 vs 4/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper for input: $0.60 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.6-27B?
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,144.

The Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.