Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.8-27B
CompanyMetaAlibaba
Release DateJuly 9, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters28B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M
Context (output)131K
Input Price / 1M$1.25
Output Price / 1M$4.25
Average Score0.80.7
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.7
OSWorld-Verified0.80.8
CharXiv-R0.90.9

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.8-27B
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
OSWorld-Verified0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8-27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8, Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7.

Recency

Qwen3.8-27B is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-27B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.