Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | Alibaba |
| Release Date | July 9, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 125B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 131K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.15 |
| Output Price / 1M | $4.25 | $0.47 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| CharXiv-R | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.8 Flash
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.8, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.
API Cost
Qwen3.8 Flash is 8.9x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.
Context Window
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.
Recency
Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/9/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.
The Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.