Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next comes from Alibaba. Muse Spark 1.1 was released in July 2026, and Qwen3.8 Flash Next followed a month later in August 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash Next has a published size of about 180 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.1.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads on 2 of them, Muse Spark 1.1 on 1. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 58.7% against 53.0%; Toolathlon, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 75.6% against 73.5%. Averaged across everything we track, Muse Spark 1.1 sits at 70.7% and Qwen3.8 Flash Next at 69.7%.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the cheaper API at $0.16 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 8 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $1.25 and $4.25. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text and images as input, while Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
CompanyMetaAlibaba
Release DateJuly 9, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters180B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)131K66K
Input Price / 1M$1.25$0.16
Output Price / 1M$4.25$0.47
Average Score70.7%69.7%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.153.0%58.7%
Toolathlon75.6%73.5%
SWE-Bench Pro61.5%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE 1.10.5 vs 0.6
0.5
0.6
Toolathlon0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.1 — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 8.7x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 7/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper for input: $0.16 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.