Muse Spark 1.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 is developed by Meta, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comes from NVIDIA. Both were released in August 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) has a published size of about 30 billion parameters; Meta has not disclosed the parameter count of Muse Spark 1.2.

We have 3 benchmark results for Muse Spark 1.2 and 13 benchmark results for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B), but they overlap on a single test: Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Muse Spark 1.2 scores 83.0% against 24.6%.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is the cheaper API at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 2 times cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 at $0.10 and $0.20. Muse Spark 1.2 takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B). Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text and images as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) accepts text.

CharacteristicMuse Spark 1.2Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyMetaNVIDIA
Release DateAugust 5, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters30B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)131K262K
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.05
Output Price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Average Score71.0%45.3%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.183.0%24.6%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.2
0.8
0.2

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.2 — 0.7, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.5.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 1.2x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.10/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark 1.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/5/2026 and 8/11/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.10.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Muse Spark 1.2 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,100.

The Muse Spark 1.2 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.2 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.