Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Meta | Alibaba |
| Release Date | September 2, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 180B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Context (output) | 944K | 66K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.16 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.20 | $0.47 |
| Average Score | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| DeepSWE 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Muse Spark 1.3
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE 1.10.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3 leads in 1 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.3 — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7.
API Cost
Muse Spark 1.3 is 2.1x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.16/1M tokens.
Context Window
Same context size: 1M tokens.
Recency
Both models were released around the same time: 9/2/2026 and 8/26/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.16.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next?
Muse Spark 1.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.
The Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash Next page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.