Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash comes from Alibaba. Both were released in September 2026.

We have 11 benchmark results for Muse Spark 1.3 and 5 benchmark results for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.

Muse Spark 1.3 is available through an API at $1.25 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
CompanyMetaAlibaba
Release DateSeptember 2, 2026September 18, 2026
Parameters——
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M—
Context (output)944K—
Input Price / 1M$1.25—
Output Price / 1M$4.25—
Average Score73.4%80.7%

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark 1.3 — 0.7, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash — 0.8.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is newer: released 9/18/2026 vs 9/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.