Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comes from NVIDIA. Both were released in October 2026. Muse Spark Open is the larger model at roughly 816 billion parameters, against 120 billion for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

The two models share 5 published benchmarks. Muse Spark Open leads on 4 of them, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) on 1. The widest gaps are on OSWorld-Verified, where Muse Spark Open scores 80.4% against 51.1%; SciCode, where Muse Spark Open scores 58.5% against 47.1%. Averaged across everything we track, Muse Spark Open sits at 62.3% and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) at 60.9%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is the cheaper API at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens, roughly 6 times cheaper than Muse Spark Open at $1.25 and $4.25. Muse Spark Open takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 262K for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B). Muse Spark Open accepts text, images, audio, and video as input, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
CompanyMetaNVIDIA
Release DateOctober 15, 2026October 15, 2026
Parameters816B120B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)1.0M262K
Input Price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Output Price / 1M$4.25$1.00
Average Score62.3%60.9%
Benchmarks
OSWorld-Verified80.4%51.1%
SciCode58.5%47.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.176.4%66.7%
GDPval-AA46.7%40.4%
GPQA89.0%89.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Muse Spark Open
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
OSWorld-Verified0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
SciCode0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
GDPval-AA0.5 vs 0.4
0.5
0.4
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Muse Spark Open — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) — 0.6.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 4.6x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $1.25/1M tokens.

Context Window

Muse Spark Open supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 10/15/2026 and 10/15/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $1.25.
Which has a larger context window — Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?
Muse Spark Open supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,144.

The Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.