Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
CompanyNVIDIAAlibaba
Release DateAugust 11, 2026September 21, 2025
Parameters30B33B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)262K
Context (output)262K
Input Price / 1M$0.05
Output Price / 1M$0.20
Average Score0.8144.5

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows a higher average benchmark score: 144.5 vs 0.8.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 9/21/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.