Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)Qwen3.6-27B
CompanyNVIDIAAlibaba
Release DateAugust 11, 2026April 21, 2026
Parameters30B28B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)262K262K
Context (output)262K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.05$0.60
Output Price / 1M$0.20$3.60
Average Score0.81.0

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8, Qwen3.6-27B — 1.0.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 16.8x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.60/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262K vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 4/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.6-27B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.60.
Which has a larger context window — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 262,100.

The Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.