Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)Qwen3.8 Flash
CompanyNVIDIAAlibaba
Release DateAugust 11, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters30B125B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)262K1.0M
Context (output)262K131K
Input Price / 1M$0.05$0.15
Output Price / 1M$0.20$0.47
Average Score0.80.7
Benchmarks
GPQA0.80.9
IFBench0.70.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
Qwen3.8 Flash
GPQA0.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
IFBench0.7 vs 0.8
0.7
0.8

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8, Qwen3.8 Flash — 0.7.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 2.5x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $0.15/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/11/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $0.15.
Which has a larger context window — Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 262,100.

The Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) and Qwen3.8 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) or Qwen3.8 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.