Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.6-27B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicQwen3 235B A22BQwen3.6-27B
CompanyAlibabaAlibaba
Release DateApril 28, 2025April 21, 2026
Parameters235B28B
MultimodalNoYes
Context (input)128K262K
Context (output)128K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.20$0.60
Output Price / 1M$0.60$3.60
Average Score0.91.0

Verdict

Qwen3.6-27B leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9, Qwen3.6-27B — 1.0.

API Cost

Qwen3 235B A22B is 5.3x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $0.60/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262K vs 128K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.6-27B is newer: released 4/21/2026 vs 4/28/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3.6-27B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $0.60.
Which has a larger context window — Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3.6-27B?
Qwen3.6-27B supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 128,000.

The Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3.6-27B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3.6-27B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.