Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking vs Seed 2.0 Pro: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicQwen3 VL 4B ThinkingSeed 2.0 Pro
CompanyAlibabaByteDance
Release DateSeptember 22, 2025February 14, 2026
Parameters4B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)262K256K
Context (output)262K66K
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.50
Output Price / 1M$1.00$3.00
Average Score0.90.9

Verdict

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — 0.9, Seed 2.0 Pro — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 3.2x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $0.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports a larger context: 262K vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Seed 2.0 Pro is newer: released 2/14/2026 vs 9/22/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking or Seed 2.0 Pro?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking or Seed 2.0 Pro?
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $0.50.
Which has a larger context window — Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking or Seed 2.0 Pro?
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports a larger context: 262,144 tokens vs 256,000.

The Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking and Seed 2.0 Pro comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking or Seed 2.0 Pro page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.