Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5 9B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Qwen3.5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | February 15, 2026 | March 1, 2026 |
| Parameters | 397B | 9B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Average Score | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| HMMT 2025 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| C-Eval | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| MMLU-Redux | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| IFEval | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Qwen3.5 9B
HMMT 20250.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
C-Eval0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
MMLU-Redux0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
IFEval0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.5 9B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B — 0.9, Qwen3.5 9B — 0.9.
Recency
Qwen3.5 9B is newer: released 3/1/2026 vs 2/15/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.5 9B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.5 9B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.