Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
.svg?dpl=dpl_ELZfsEwZWBkW2NFewZMHoqbrXGML){kind=icon}
| Characteristic | Qwen3.8-27B | Seed 2.1 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Alibaba | ByteDance |
| Release Date | August 14, 2026 | June 24, 2026 |
| Parameters | 28B | — |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Average Score | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| BabyVision | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| ClawEval-MM | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| CharXiv-R | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| ERQA | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| MathVision | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| NL2Repo | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| RealWorldQA | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Qwen3.8-27B
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam0.3 vs 0.5
0.3
0.5
BabyVision0.9 vs 0.6
0.9
0.6
ClawEval-MM0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5
CharXiv-R0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
ERQA0.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
Terminal-Bench 2.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
SWE-Bench Pro0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
MathVision0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
NL2Repo0.4 vs 0.4
0.4
0.4
RealWorldQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
Qwen3.8-27B leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3.8-27B — 0.7, Seed 2.1 Turbo — 0.6.
Recency
Qwen3.8-27B is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 6/24/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Qwen3.8-27B and Seed 2.1 Turbo comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.