Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Sakana Namazu: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is developed by Alibaba, while Sakana Namazu comes from Sakana AI. Both were released in August 2026. Qwen3.8 Flash Next has a published size of about 180 billion parameters; Sakana AI has not disclosed the parameter count of Sakana Namazu.

We have 23 benchmark results for Qwen3.8 Flash Next and 3 benchmark results for Sakana Namazu, but they overlap on a single test: LiveCodeBench v6, where Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 91.9% against 90.3%.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is the cheaper API at $0.16 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens, roughly 6 times cheaper than Sakana Namazu at $0.95 and $4. Qwen3.8 Flash Next takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 256K for Sakana Namazu. Qwen3.8 Flash Next accepts text, images, and video as input, while Sakana Namazu accepts text and images. On tooling, only Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports function calling and only Qwen3.8 Flash Next offers structured output.

CharacteristicQwen3.8 Flash NextSakana Namazu
CompanyAlibabaSakana AI
Release DateAugust 26, 2026August 3, 2026
Parameters180B—
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M256K
Context (output)66K256K
Input Price / 1M$0.16$0.95
Output Price / 1M$0.47$4.00
Average Score67.1%92.4%
Benchmarks
LiveCodeBench v691.9%90.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Sakana Namazu
LiveCodeBench v60.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3.8 Flash Next — 0.7, Sakana Namazu — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is 7.9x cheaper: input $0.16/1M vs $0.95/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Qwen3.8 Flash Next is newer: released 8/26/2026 vs 8/3/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Qwen3.8 Flash Next or Sakana Namazu?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Qwen3.8 Flash Next or Sakana Namazu?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper for input: $0.16 per 1M tokens vs $0.95.
Which has a larger context window — Qwen3.8 Flash Next or Sakana Namazu?
Qwen3.8 Flash Next supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000.

The Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Sakana Namazu comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3.8 Flash Next or Sakana Namazu page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.