Qwen3.8 Max vs Solar Pro 4: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba, while Solar Pro 4 comes from Upstage. Both were released in August 2026. Qwen3.8 Max has a published size of about 2.4 trillion parameters; Upstage has not disclosed the parameter count of Solar Pro 4.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of them. The widest gaps are on Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Qwen3.8 Max scores 86.6% against 57.0%; GPQA, where Qwen3.8 Max scores 92.6% against 89.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Qwen3.8 Max sits at 71.0% and Solar Pro 4 at 69.9%.

Solar Pro 4 is the cheaper API at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens, roughly 8 times cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $2.50 and $6.25. Qwen3.8 Max takes the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared with 524K for Solar Pro 4. Qwen3.8 Max accepts text and images as input, while Solar Pro 4 accepts text. On tooling, only Qwen3.8 Max supports function calling and only Qwen3.8 Max offers structured output.

CharacteristicQwen3.8 MaxSolar Pro 4
CompanyAlibabaUpstage
Release DateAugust 2, 2026August 6, 2026
Parameters2.4T
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M524K
Context (output)131K131K
Input Price / 1M$2.50$0.30
Output Price / 1M$6.25$1.20
Average Score71.0%69.9%
Benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.186.6%57.0%
GPQA92.6%89.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max
Solar Pro 4
Terminal-Bench 2.10.9 vs 0.6
0.9
0.6
GPQA0.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Qwen3.8 Max — 0.7, Solar Pro 4 — 0.7.

API Cost

Solar Pro 4 is 5.8x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $2.50/1M tokens.

Context Window

Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1M vs 524K tokens.

Recency

Both models were released around the same time: 8/2/2026 and 8/6/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Qwen3.8 Max or Solar Pro 4?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Qwen3.8 Max or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4 is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $2.50.
Which has a larger context window — Qwen3.8 Max or Solar Pro 4?
Qwen3.8 Max supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 524,288.

The Qwen3.8 Max and Solar Pro 4 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Qwen3.8 Max or Solar Pro 4 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.