Claude Fable 5
MultimodalClaude Fable 5 is Anthropic's generally available deployment of the same underlying weights as the restricted Claude Mythos 5 model, adding production safeguards for public use. It leads on agentic coding, software engineering, and computer-use benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Verified, FrontierSWE, and OSWorld-Verified while offering a 1M-token context window.
Key Specifications
Parameters
-
Context
1.0M
Release Date
June 9, 2026
Average Score
60.7%
Timeline
Key dates in the model's history
Announcement
June 9, 2026
Last Update
August 27, 2026
Technical Specifications
Parameters
-
Training Tokens
-
Knowledge Cutoff
-
Family
-
Capabilities
MultimodalZeroEval
Pricing & Availability
Input (per 1M tokens)
$10.00
Output (per 1M tokens)
$50.00
Max Input Tokens
1.0M
Max Output Tokens
128.0K
Supported Features
Function CallingStructured OutputCode ExecutionWeb SearchBatch InferenceFine-tuning
Benchmark Results
Model performance metrics across various tests and benchmarks
Programming
Programming skills tests
SWE-Bench Verified
Fable 5 production-safeguarded configuration on the 500-problem SWE-Bench Verified subset; average over 5 trials with thinking blocks included. Mythos 5 scored 95.5%. • Self-reported
Other Tests
Specialized benchmarks
AutomationBench
Zapier AutomationBench private held-out set at max effort. End-to-end business workflows across simulated company APIs. • Self-reported
BioMysteryBench
Hard subset: 46.1%. Human-solved subset: 83.9%. Blocking safeguards cause Fable 5 to perform closer to Opus 4.8 due to fallbacks. System card reports this as a Mythos 5 or combined launch-table score rather than a separate Fable-only production score; Fable may fall back to Opus 4.8 when safeguards trigger. • Self-reported
Blueprint-Bench 2
Spatial reasoning evaluation. • Self-reported
DeepSWE 1.1
DeepSWE v1.1 leaderboard, mini-swe-agent harness, max effort; Pass@1 70% ± 4%. • Self-reported
ExploitBench
Cybersecurity capture rate (Cap%). Blocking safeguards cause Fable 5 to perform closer to Opus 4.8 due to fallbacks; score reflects Claude Mythos 5. System card reports this as a Mythos 5 or combined launch-table score rather than a separate Fable-only production score; Fable may fall back to Opus 4.8 when safeguards trigger. • Self-reported
Finance Agent v2
• Self-reported
FrontierCode
FrontierCode Main subset at xhigh reasoning effort. Score 46.3%, pass rate 48.8%; Fable 5 ranks #1 and outperforms every other model even at medium effort. • Self-reported
FrontierCode 1.1
FrontierCode 1.1 current leaderboard; mergeability score at xhigh effort: 53.5%. • Self-reported
FrontierSWE
Claude Code • Self-reported
GDP.pdf
Document and vision-heavy knowledge-work evaluation, no tools. • Self-reported
HealthBench Professional
Health evaluation. Blocking safeguards cause Fable 5 to perform closer to Opus 4.8 due to fallbacks. System card reports this as a Mythos 5 or combined launch-table score rather than a separate Fable-only production score; Fable may fall back to Opus 4.8 when safeguards trigger. • Self-reported
Humanity's Last Exam
Multidisciplinary reasoning. With tools: 64.5%. Without tools: 59.0%. Blocking safeguards cause Fable 5 to perform closer to Opus 4.8 on some questions due to fallbacks. System card reports this as a Mythos 5 or combined launch-table score rather than a separate Fable-only production score; Fable may fall back to Opus 4.8 when safeguards trigger. • Self-reported
Legal Agent Benchmark
Legal Agent Benchmark, Harvey's held-out set. • Self-reported
LiveBench
2026-01-08, Thinking xHigh Effort • Self-reported
OSWorld-Verified
Fable 5 production-safeguarded configuration. OSWorld score reflects the updated harness with zoom-tool bug fix and 128K max tokens per turn. • Self-reported
SWE-Bench Pro
Fable 5 production-safeguarded configuration on SWE-Bench Pro; average over 5 trials with thinking blocks included. Mythos 5 scored 80.3%. • Self-reported
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Fable 5 production-safeguarded configuration on the mini-SWE-agent harness, high effort, 89 tasks x 5 attempts. 20.9% of trials hit a safety refusal and fell back to Claude Opus 4.8 for the rest of the trajectory; Mythos 5 scored 88.0%. • Self-reported
License & Metadata
License
proprietary
Announcement Date
June 9, 2026
Last Updated
August 27, 2026
Compare Claude Fable 5
All comparisonsSimilar Models
All ModelsClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.9 (HumanEval)
Released:Jun 2024
Price:$3.00/1M tokens
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
MM
Best score:1.0 (ARC)
Released:Feb 2024
Price:$15.00/1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
MM
Best score:1.0 (TAU)
Released:Feb 2026
Price:$5.00/1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.9 (GPQA)
Released:Feb 2026
Price:$3.00/1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.9 (GPQA)
Released:May 2026
Price:$5.00/1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.8 (TAU)
Released:Aug 2025
Price:$15.00/1M tokens
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.9 (ARC)
Released:Mar 2024
Price:$0.25/1M tokens
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
MM
Best score:0.8 (TAU)
Released:Oct 2025
Price:$1.00/1M tokens
Recommendations are based on similarity of characteristics: developer organization, multimodality, parameter size, and benchmark performance. Choose a model to compare or go to the full catalog to browse all available AI models.