Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 comes from DeepSeek. Claude Fable 5 was released in June 2026, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 followed a month later in July 2026. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has a published size of about 304 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.

The two models share 2 published benchmarks. They split them evenly, 1 to 1. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores 25.1% against 17.4%; Terminal-Bench 2.1, where Claude Fable 5 scores 84.3% against 83.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5 sits at 59.8% and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at 57.5%.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is the cheaper API at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens, roughly 71 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $10 and $50. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Fable 5 accepts text and images as input, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 accepts text.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateJune 9, 2026July 31, 2026
Parameters304B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K393K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.14
Output Price / 1M$50.00$0.28
Average Score59.8%57.5%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench17.4%25.1%
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%83.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
AutomationBench0.2 vs 0.3
0.2
0.3
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 — 0.6.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is 142.9x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is newer: released 7/31/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.