Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 comes from DeepSeek. Claude Fable 5 was released in June 2026, and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 followed 2 months later in August 2026. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has a published size of about 1.6 trillion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on 2 of them, Claude Fable 5 on 1. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores 31.8% against 17.4%; Humanity's Last Exam, where Claude Fable 5 scores 64.5% against 60.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5 sits at 59.8% and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 at 60.6%.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is the cheaper API at $1.32 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens, roughly 8 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $10 and $50. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Fable 5 accepts text and images as input, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 accepts text.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateJune 9, 2026August 13, 2026
Parameters—1.6T
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K393K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$1.32
Output Price / 1M$50.00$3.96
Average Score59.8%60.6%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench17.4%31.8%
Humanity's Last Exam64.5%60.0%
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%88.0%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
AutomationBench0.2 vs 0.3
0.2
0.3
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9

Verdict

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 — 0.6.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 11.4x cheaper: input $1.32/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is newer: released 8/13/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper for input: $1.32 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?
Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.