Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5 is developed by Anthropic, while GLM-5.3 comes from Zhipu AI. Claude Fable 5 was released in June 2026, and GLM-5.3 followed 2 months later in August 2026. GLM-5.3 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Fable 5.

The two models share 7 published benchmarks. Claude Fable 5 leads on 5 of them, GLM-5.3 on 2. The widest gaps are on AutomationBench, where GLM-5.3 scores 48.2% against 17.4%; ExploitBench, where Claude Fable 5 scores 78.0% against 54.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Fable 5 sits at 59.8% and GLM-5.3 at 52.2%.

GLM-5.3 is the cheaper API at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, roughly 7 times cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $10 and $50. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Fable 5 accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.3 accepts text.

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5GLM-5.3
CompanyAnthropicZhipu AI
Release DateJune 9, 2026August 14, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$1.40
Output Price / 1M$50.00$4.40
Average Score59.8%52.2%
Benchmarks
AutomationBench17.4%48.2%
ExploitBench78.0%54.4%
FrontierSWE90.0%78.0%
Terminal-Bench 2.184.3%88.0%
DeepSWE 1.170.0%66.9%
Terminal-Bench 4.044.5%41.8%
Humanity's Last Exam64.5%62.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
GLM-5.3
AutomationBench0.2 vs 0.5
0.2
0.5
ExploitBench0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
FrontierSWE0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.9
0.8
0.9
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
Terminal-Bench 4.00.4 vs 0.4
0.4
0.4
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.6
0.6
0.6

Verdict

GLM-5.3 leads in 3 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, GLM-5.3 — 0.5.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 is 10.3x cheaper: input $1.40/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

GLM-5.3 is newer: released 8/14/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 is cheaper for input: $1.40 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?
GLM-5.3 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and GLM-5.3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.