Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling-Small: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5Inkling-Small
CompanyAnthropicThinking Machines Lab
Release DateJune 9, 2026July 30, 2026
Parameters276B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M256K
Context (output)128K256K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.30
Output Price / 1M$50.00$1.20
Average Score0.60.6
Benchmarks
Humanity's Last Exam0.60.3
SWE-Bench Pro0.80.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.80.6
SWE-Bench Verified0.90.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Fable 5
Inkling-Small
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.3
0.6
0.3
SWE-Bench Pro0.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
SWE-Bench Verified0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Inkling-Small leads in 2 out of 5 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, Inkling-Small — 0.6.

Programming

On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Claude Fable 5 — 0.9, Inkling-Small — 0.8.

API Cost

Inkling-Small is 40.0x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.

Recency

Inkling-Small is newer: released 7/30/2026 vs 6/9/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or Inkling-Small?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, Claude Fable 5 shows a better result: 0.9 vs 0.8.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is cheaper for input: $0.30 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or Inkling-Small?
Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and Inkling-Small comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or Inkling-Small page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.