Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Glimmer-30B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Fable 5 | Muse Glimmer-30B |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Meta |
| Release Date | June 9, 2026 | August 10, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 30B |
| Multimodal | Yes | Yes |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | — |
| Context (output) | 128K | — |
| Input Price / 1M | $10.00 | — |
| Output Price / 1M | $50.00 | — |
| Average Score | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| Humanity's Last Exam | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| OSWorld-Verified | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Fable 5
Muse Glimmer-30B
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.2
0.6
0.2
Terminal-Bench 2.10.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
SWE-Bench Pro0.8 vs 0.5
0.8
0.5
OSWorld-Verified0.8 vs 0.7
0.8
0.7
SWE-Bench Verified0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
Verdict
Muse Glimmer-30B leads in 1 out of 3 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.7.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Claude Fable 5 — 0.9, Muse Glimmer-30B — 0.8.
Recency
Muse Glimmer-30B is newer: released 8/10/2026 vs 6/9/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
On the SWE-Bench benchmark, Claude Fable 5 shows a better result: 0.9 vs 0.8.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or Muse Glimmer-30B?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.
The Claude Fable 5 and Muse Glimmer-30B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or Muse Glimmer-30B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.