Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Fable 5Qwen3 235B A22B
CompanyAnthropicAlibaba
Release DateJune 9, 2026April 28, 2025
Parameters235B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M128K
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Output Price / 1M$50.00$0.60
Average Score0.60.9

Verdict

Claude Fable 5 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Fable 5 — 0.6, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 235B A22B is 75.0x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $10.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.

Recency

Claude Fable 5 is newer: released 6/9/2026 vs 4/28/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $10.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Claude Fable 5 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000.

The Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.