Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-4.7-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Zhipu AI |
| Release Date | February 4, 2026 | January 18, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 30B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 128K |
| Context (output) | 128K | 16K |
| Input Price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.07 |
| Output Price / 1M | $25.00 | $0.40 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| BrowseComp | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| GPQA | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| AIME 2025 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6
GLM-4.7-Flash
BrowseComp0.7 vs 0.4
0.7
0.4
SWE-Bench Verified0.8 vs 0.6
0.8
0.6
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
AIME 20251.0 vs 0.9
1.0
0.9
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 2 out of 5 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6.
Programming
On SWE-Bench, both models are nearly equal: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6.
API Cost
GLM-4.7-Flash is 63.8x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.
Recency
Claude Opus 4.6 is newer: released 2/4/2026 vs 1/18/2026.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-4.7-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-4.7-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.