Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax M2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 4.6MiniMax M2
CompanyAnthropicMiniMax
Release DateFebruary 4, 2026October 26, 2025
Parameters230B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K100K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$1.00
Output Price / 1M$25.00$4.00
Average Score0.80.8
Benchmarks
AIME 20251.00.8
GPQA0.90.8

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6
MiniMax M2
AIME 20251.0 vs 0.8
1.0
0.8
GPQA0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, MiniMax M2 — 0.8.

API Cost

MiniMax M2 is 6.0x cheaper: input $1.00/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 4.6 is newer: released 2/4/2026 vs 10/26/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2?
MiniMax M2 is cheaper for input: $1.00 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Opus 4.6 and MiniMax M2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or MiniMax M2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.