Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 235B A22B: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 235B A22B
CompanyAnthropicAlibaba
Release DateFebruary 4, 2026April 28, 2025
Parameters235B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M128K
Context (output)128K128K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$0.20
Output Price / 1M$25.00$0.60
Average Score0.80.9

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, Qwen3 235B A22B — 0.9.

API Cost

Qwen3 235B A22B is 37.5x cheaper: input $0.20/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1M vs 128K tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 4.6 is newer: released 2/4/2026 vs 4/28/2025.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B is cheaper for input: $0.20 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000.

The Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 235B A22B comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 235B A22B page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.