Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Release Date | February 4, 2026 | July 24, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 235B |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Context (input) | 1.0M | 256K |
| Context (output) | 128K | 131K |
| Input Price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.30 |
| Output Price / 1M | $25.00 | $3.00 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2025 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
AIME 20251.0 vs 0.9
1.0
0.9
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 4.6 — 0.8, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 — 0.9.
API Cost
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 9.1x cheaper: input $0.30/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6 supports a larger context: 1M vs 256K tokens.
Recency
Claude Opus 4.6 is newer: released 2/4/2026 vs 7/24/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.