Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber comes from Google. Both were released in September 2026.

We have 31 benchmark results for Claude Opus 5.5 and 4 benchmark results for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, but they were measured on different benchmarks, so there is no like-for-like scoreboard.

Claude Opus 5.5 is available through an API at $4 per million input tokens with a 1M-token context window. We do not track a hosted API for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so pricing and context cannot be compared directly.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
CompanyAnthropicGoogle
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026September 2, 2026
Parameters——
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M—
Context (output)128K—
Input Price / 1M$4.00—
Output Price / 1M$20.00—
Average Score71.1%74.6%

Verdict

Claude Opus 5.5 leads in 1 out of 2 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5.5 — 0.7, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber — 0.7.

Recency

Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 9/2/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
API pricing data is available on the individual model pages.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?
Context window data is available on the individual model pages.

The Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.