Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.3 Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while GLM-5.3 Flash comes from Zhipu AI. GLM-5.3 Flash was released in August 2026, and Claude Opus 5.5 followed a month later in September 2026. GLM-5.3 Flash has a published size of about 320 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.5.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 3 of them, GLM-5.3 Flash on 1. The widest gaps are on Chartography, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 89.0% against 78.0%; DeepSWE 1.1, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 74.2% against 63.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 71.1% and GLM-5.3 Flash at 64.1%.

GLM-5.3 Flash is the cheaper API at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, roughly 27 times cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.3 Flash accepts text, images, and video.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5.5GLM-5.3 Flash
CompanyAnthropicZhipu AI
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026August 26, 2026
Parameters—320B
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$4.00$0.15
Output Price / 1M$20.00$0.50
Average Score71.1%64.1%
Benchmarks
Chartography89.0%78.0%
DeepSWE 1.174.2%63.4%
AutomationBench40.0%48.8%
OfficeQA Pro67.7%62.4%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5
GLM-5.3 Flash
Chartography0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6
AutomationBench0.4 vs 0.5
0.4
0.5
OfficeQA Pro0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5.5 — 0.7, GLM-5.3 Flash — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.3 Flash is 36.9x cheaper: input $0.15/1M vs $4.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 8/26/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
GLM-5.3 Flash is cheaper for input: $0.15 per 1M tokens vs $4.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3 Flash?
Claude Opus 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM-5.3 Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM-5.3 Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.