Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Kimi K3 comes from Moonshot AI. Kimi K3 was released in July 2026, and Claude Opus 5.5 followed 2 months later in September 2026. Kimi K3 has a published size of about 2.8 trillion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.5.

The two models share 4 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 4 of them. The widest gaps are on Program Bench, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 91.2% against 77.8%; AutomationBench, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 40.0% against 30.8%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 71.1% and Kimi K3 at 67.8%.

Kimi K3 is the cheaper API at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, about 33% below Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Both accept text and images as input.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5.5Kimi K3
CompanyAnthropicMoonshot AI
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026July 16, 2026
Parameters—2.8T
MultimodalYesYes
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K1.0M
Input Price / 1M$4.00$3.00
Output Price / 1M$20.00$15.00
Average Score71.1%67.8%
Benchmarks
Program Bench91.2%77.8%
AutomationBench40.0%30.8%
DeepSWE 1.174.2%69.0%
OfficeQA Pro67.7%63.3%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5
Kimi K3
Program Bench0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8
AutomationBench0.4 vs 0.3
0.4
0.3
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.7
0.7
0.7
OfficeQA Pro0.7 vs 0.6
0.7
0.6

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5.5 — 0.7, Kimi K3 — 0.7.

API Cost

Kimi K3 is 1.3x cheaper: input $3.00/1M vs $4.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 7/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is cheaper for input: $3.00 per 1M tokens vs $4.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?
Claude Opus 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.