Claude Opus 5.5 vs Laguna S 2.1: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic, while Laguna S 2.1 comes from Poolside. Laguna S 2.1 was released in July 2026, and Claude Opus 5.5 followed 2 months later in September 2026. Laguna S 2.1 has a published size of about 118 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.5.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5.5 leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on DeepSWE 1.1, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 74.2% against 40.4%; SWE-Bench Pro, where Claude Opus 5.5 scores 89.9% against 59.4%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5.5 sits at 71.1% and Laguna S 2.1 at 57.4%.

Laguna S 2.1 is the cheaper API at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens, roughly 40 times cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 accepts text and images as input, while Laguna S 2.1 accepts text. On tooling, only Claude Opus 5.5 supports function calling and only Claude Opus 5.5 offers structured output.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5.5Laguna S 2.1
CompanyAnthropicPoolside
Release DateSeptember 22, 2026July 21, 2026
Parameters—118B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K—
Input Price / 1M$4.00$0.10
Output Price / 1M$20.00$0.20
Average Score71.1%57.4%
Benchmarks
DeepSWE 1.174.2%40.4%
SWE-Bench Pro89.9%59.4%
SWE-bench Multilingual93.9%78.5%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5.5
Laguna S 2.1
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.4
0.7
0.4
SWE-Bench Pro0.9 vs 0.6
0.9
0.6
SWE-bench Multilingual0.9 vs 0.8
0.9
0.8

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5.5 — 0.7, Laguna S 2.1 — 0.6.

API Cost

Laguna S 2.1 is 80.0x cheaper: input $0.10/1M vs $4.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5.5 is newer: released 9/22/2026 vs 7/21/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper for input: $0.10 per 1M tokens vs $4.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1?
Claude Opus 5.5 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,048,576.

The Claude Opus 5.5 and Laguna S 2.1 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5.5 or Laguna S 2.1 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.