Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
CompanyAnthropicDeepSeek
Release DateJuly 24, 2026April 23, 2026
Parameters284B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$0.14
Output Price / 1M$25.00$0.28
Average Score0.60.9

Verdict

Both models show equal results — the choice depends on your specific use case.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5 — 0.6, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 — 0.9.

API Cost

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is 71.4x cheaper: input $0.14/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Same context size: 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5 is newer: released 7/24/2026 vs 4/23/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is cheaper for input: $0.14 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423?
Claude Opus 5 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.