Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.2: Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic, while GLM-5.2 comes from Zhipu AI. GLM-5.2 was released in June 2026, and Claude Opus 5 followed a month later in July 2026. GLM-5.2 has a published size of about 753 billion parameters; Anthropic has not disclosed the parameter count of Claude Opus 5.

The two models share 3 published benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 leads on 3 of them. The widest gaps are on FrontierCode 1.1, where Claude Opus 5 scores 53.4% against 24.5%; DeepSWE 1.1, where Claude Opus 5 scores 68.8% against 44.0%. Averaged across everything we track, Claude Opus 5 sits at 55.0% and GLM-5.2 at 60.9%.

GLM-5.2 is the cheaper API at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, roughly 4 times cheaper than Claude Opus 5 at $5 and $25. Both accept a context window of about 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5 accepts text and images as input, while GLM-5.2 accepts text.

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5GLM-5.2
CompanyAnthropicZhipu AI
Release DateJuly 24, 2026June 16, 2026
Parameters753B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M1.0M
Context (output)128K131K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$1.40
Output Price / 1M$25.00$4.40
Average Score55.0%60.9%
Benchmarks
FrontierCode 1.153.4%24.5%
DeepSWE 1.168.8%44.0%
Humanity's Last Exam64.7%54.7%

Visual Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5
GLM-5.2
FrontierCode 1.10.5 vs 0.2
0.5
0.2
DeepSWE 1.10.7 vs 0.4
0.7
0.4
Humanity's Last Exam0.6 vs 0.5
0.6
0.5

Verdict

GLM-5.2 leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5 — 0.5, GLM-5.2 — 0.6.

API Cost

GLM-5.2 is 5.2x cheaper: input $1.40/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1M vs 1M tokens.

Recency

Claude Opus 5 is newer: released 7/24/2026 vs 6/16/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5 or GLM-5.2?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5 or GLM-5.2?
GLM-5.2 is cheaper for input: $1.40 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5 or GLM-5.2?
GLM-5.2 supports a larger context: 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000.

The Claude Opus 5 and GLM-5.2 comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5 or GLM-5.2 page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.