Claude Opus 5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B): Specs & Benchmark Comparison

CharacteristicClaude Opus 5Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)
CompanyAnthropicNVIDIA
Release DateJuly 24, 2026August 11, 2026
Parameters30B
MultimodalYesNo
Context (input)1.0M262K
Context (output)128K262K
Input Price / 1M$5.00$0.05
Output Price / 1M$25.00$0.20
Average Score0.60.8

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.

Overall Performance

Both models show comparable average scores: Claude Opus 5 — 0.6, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) — 0.8.

API Cost

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is 120.0x cheaper: input $0.05/1M vs $5.00/1M tokens.

Context Window

Claude Opus 5 supports a larger context: 1M vs 262K tokens.

Recency

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is newer: released 8/11/2026 vs 7/24/2026.

More About These Models

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Direct comparison on the SWE-Bench benchmark is not available. We recommend reviewing other metrics on the comparison page.
Which model is cheaper — Claude Opus 5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) is cheaper for input: $0.05 per 1M tokens vs $5.00.
Which has a larger context window — Claude Opus 5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)?
Claude Opus 5 supports a larger context: 1,000,000 tokens vs 262,100.

The Claude Opus 5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the Claude Opus 5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B) page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.