DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GLM-4.7-Flash: Specs & Benchmark Comparison
| Characteristic | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Company | DeepSeek | Zhipu AI |
| Release Date | September 28, 2025 | January 18, 2026 |
| Parameters | 685B | 30B |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Context (input) | 164K | 128K |
| Context (output) | 66K | 16K |
| Input Price / 1M | $0.27 | $0.07 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.41 | $0.40 |
| Average Score | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| AIME 2025 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Visual Benchmark Comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
GLM-4.7-Flash
GPQA0.8 vs 0.8
0.8
0.8
AIME 20250.9 vs 0.9
0.9
0.9
Verdict
GLM-4.7-Flash leads in 2 out of 4 comparison categories.
Overall Performance
Both models show comparable average scores: DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp — 0.8, GLM-4.7-Flash — 0.6.
API Cost
GLM-4.7-Flash is 1.4x cheaper: input $0.07/1M vs $0.27/1M tokens.
Context Window
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp supports a larger context: 164K vs 128K tokens.
Recency
GLM-4.7-Flash is newer: released 1/18/2026 vs 9/28/2025.
More About These Models
Related Comparisons
The DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and GLM-4.7-Flash comparison is updated for 2026. Data includes benchmark results, API pricing, context window size and other specifications. For more detailed information, visit the DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or GLM-4.7-Flash page. See also the complete list of AI model comparisons.